Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: backfill integration records #128

Conversation

JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
Copy link
Contributor

@JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername commented Jan 31, 2025

(cherry picked from commit f84275d)

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com/t/86cxv5qbm

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced workspace processing script with logging and error handling.
    • Improved tracking of workspace integration settings.
  • Chores

    • Updated functionality for managing completed onboarding workspaces.
    • Adjusted payload handling in integration settings requests.

(cherry picked from commit f84275d)
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request enhances the 003_create_integration_records.py script by adding logging functionality and error handling. It imports the Workspace model and the post_to_integration_settings task, retrieves all Workspace instances with an onboarding_state of 'COMPLETE', and processes each workspace while logging the status. The script tracks successful and failed operations, logging a summary at the end.

Changes

File Change Summary
scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py Added logging and error handling; iterates through Workspace instances with onboarding_state='COMPLETE', calls post_to_integration_settings, and logs results.
apps/workspaces/tasks.py Modified post_to_integration_settings to pass the payload dictionary directly to post_request without JSON conversion.
apps/workspaces/models.py Added Workspace class.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ruuushhh
  • ashwin1111

Poem

🐰 Workspaces hopping, settings in sight,
Integrations dancing with delight!
From onboarding's end to settings' embrace,
A rabbit's script runs with magical grace! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
67 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 9.179s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8fbc6d and 1fd7acb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: pytest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py (2)

1-2: LGTM!

The imports are clean and specific to the script's requirements.


7-7: Verify the behavior of post_to_integration_settings task.

The script sets is_active=True for all workspaces. Please verify:

  1. If this is the intended behavior
  2. The implementation of the task to ensure it handles this parameter correctly
✅ Verification successful

Setting is_active=True for completed workspaces is the intended behavior

The implementation is consistent with other usages in the codebase, where post_to_integration_settings is called with active=True for workspaces that have completed onboarding.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of post_to_integration_settings task

# Search for the task implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def post_to_integration_settings($$$)'

# Search for other usages of this task to understand the expected behavior
rg 'post_to_integration_settings' -A 5

Length of output: 1708

scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S Small PR and removed size/XS Extra Small PR labels Jan 31, 2025
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
67 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 9.204s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
67 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 9.483s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/workspaces/tasks.py (2)

194-195: Enhance error handling and logging.

The current error handling could be improved to:

  1. Include context (workspace_id, org_id) in error logs
  2. Handle specific exceptions separately
  3. Consider implementing retries for transient failures
-    except Exception as error:
-        logger.error(error)
+    except Exception as error:
+        logger.error(
+            'Failed to post integration settings for workspace_id: %s | Error: %s',
+            workspace_id,
+            error
+        )

175-179: Add comprehensive function documentation.

The function's docstring should document:

  1. Parameters and their types
  2. Return type
  3. Possible exceptions
 def post_to_integration_settings(workspace_id: int, active: bool):
     """
     Post to integration settings
+
+    Args:
+        workspace_id (int): The ID of the workspace
+        active (bool): Flag indicating if the integration is active
+
+    Raises:
+        Exception: If the API request fails or authentication fails
     """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0de3f34 and b9eb146.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/workspaces/tasks.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: pytest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/workspaces/tasks.py (1)

190-190: LGTM! Simplified payload passing.

The change to directly pass the payload dictionary to post_request is correct, as modern HTTP libraries typically handle JSON serialization internally.

@JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername merged commit 0393724 into update-integrations-table-2 Feb 3, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants