-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: backfill integration records #128
feat: backfill integration records #128
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit f84275d)
WalkthroughThe pull request enhances the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: pytest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/python/003_create_integration_records.py (2)
1-2
: LGTM!The imports are clean and specific to the script's requirements.
7-7
: Verify the behavior of post_to_integration_settings task.The script sets
is_active=True
for all workspaces. Please verify:
- If this is the intended behavior
- The implementation of the task to ensure it handles this parameter correctly
✅ Verification successful
Setting is_active=True for completed workspaces is the intended behavior
The implementation is consistent with other usages in the codebase, where post_to_integration_settings is called with active=True for workspaces that have completed onboarding.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of post_to_integration_settings task # Search for the task implementation ast-grep --pattern 'def post_to_integration_settings($$$)' # Search for other usages of this task to understand the expected behavior rg 'post_to_integration_settings' -A 5Length of output: 1708
|
This behaviour was changed in #125
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/workspaces/tasks.py (2)
194-195
: Enhance error handling and logging.The current error handling could be improved to:
- Include context (workspace_id, org_id) in error logs
- Handle specific exceptions separately
- Consider implementing retries for transient failures
- except Exception as error: - logger.error(error) + except Exception as error: + logger.error( + 'Failed to post integration settings for workspace_id: %s | Error: %s', + workspace_id, + error + )
175-179
: Add comprehensive function documentation.The function's docstring should document:
- Parameters and their types
- Return type
- Possible exceptions
def post_to_integration_settings(workspace_id: int, active: bool): """ Post to integration settings + + Args: + workspace_id (int): The ID of the workspace + active (bool): Flag indicating if the integration is active + + Raises: + Exception: If the API request fails or authentication fails """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/workspaces/tasks.py
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: pytest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/workspaces/tasks.py (1)
190-190
: LGTM! Simplified payload passing.The change to directly pass the payload dictionary to post_request is correct, as modern HTTP libraries typically handle JSON serialization internally.
0393724
into
update-integrations-table-2
(cherry picked from commit f84275d)
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cxv5qbm
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores